Sarah Jarboe named Chair of KBA environment, energy and resources law section Read More
Sarah Jarboe named Chair of KBA environment, energy and resources law section Read More
Where do you file a product liability lawsuit? Most of the time, the answer is simple. You file it where the actionable issue occurred. If you live in Kentucky and that's where the accident happened, it's easy to determine you file your lawsuit in Kentucky. Sometimes, there are multiple possibilities for where to file a suit. If the opposing party doesn't like the plaintiff's choice of court, the opposing party can ask for a dismissal of the case or, in some situations, a transfer. If the plaintiff disagrees with the trial court's order regarding jurisdiction or choice of forum, the plaintiff can file an appeal. Once the proper court has been decided, another possible issue is that of choice of law. Typically, this question arises when an issue could possibly be resolved according to the law of two or more states. However, sometimes, the choice of law question involves the law of differing nations. Read More
Young Lawyers Division lunch honors history Read More
A negligence case has four components: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Sometimes, a particular situation - such as a slip and fall injury, an act of medical malpractice, or a defective product - turns a simple negligence case into a more complex inquiry.Sometimes, however, the opposite is true. A recent case from the Kentucky Court of Appeals illustrates this point. Facts of the Case In Campbell v. Pro Video Audio Productions, Inc., the plaintiff was working as a professional stagehand at a concert in Louisville in 2012 when his foot became entangled in a tarp placed on the stage. He fell approximately seven feet, hurting his arm, leg, face, and hand. He sued the defendant, who was in the business of providing stage construction and sound system services, alleging that it had created an unreasonably dangerous condition by failing to place handrails around the stage. Read More
By Kyle Roby, Attorney English, Lucas, Priest and Owsley, LLP Car accidents, truck wrecks, and other motor vehicle crashes fall under the general law of negligence. In order to prove a negligence case, a plaintiff has to prove four separate elements: duty, breach of duty, causation, and damages. Each element must be proven by a preponderance of the evidence, which is when the jury finds that the plaintiff's version of the facts is more likely true than not. It does not require the injured person to prove beyond a reasonable doubt these elements, as in the criminal justice system, but rather only that it is more likely than not that there was a breach in a duty owed to the injured person that caused damages. Once the plaintiff has presented his or her case at trial, and the judge has determined that he or she has made a prima facie case of negligence, the defendant has the right to offer evidence that contradicts the plaintiff's version of the facts or impeaches the plaintiff's testimony. The jury is the ultimate trier of fact, taxed with the duty of deciding which witness to believe when the testimony is conflicting. Read More
Bob Young to speak at Managing Partner Forum in Atlanta Read More
By Nathan Vinson, Attorney English, Lucas, Priest and Owsley, LLP Tax Day is a day that we know you celebrate with great abandon. Right? If you do in fact go all out for Tax Day, this year, you’ll need to move your Tax Day celebrations to April 18. Traditionally, Tax Day is April 15. In some circumstances, it is moved back a few days to accommodate a holiday. This year, Tax Day is April 18 because of Emancipation Day, which is a holiday in Washington, D.C. that marks the anniversary of the abolition of slavery in the nation’s capital. It is celebrated annually on April 16. Because that date falls on a Saturday, Emancipation Day will be officially celebrated on April 15 this year, shutting down city offices. Tax Day is also moved when April 15 falls on a Saturday or Sunday. It is then moved to the following Monday. Read More
Workers' compensation was designed as a compromise. An injured worker does not have to prove that his or her employer was negligent (as is required in most personal injury cases), but the worker's monetary recovery is typically less than it would be in a negligence case. Whether or not this is a fair trade-off is a controversial subject. The good news for an injured worker is that he or she can receive medical care and payment of temporary and, if applicable, permanent disability benefits, even if he or she cannot show that the employer did anything to cause the injury complained of. The bad news is that, even if the employer was at fault, the payout to the worker remains the same, with no compensation for pain and suffering or loss of consortium to the injured person's spouse. Sometimes, the parties disagree as to whether an injury was sustained during the course and scope of employment. For instance, an employee may be away from the business premises at the time of an accident (such as a car crash) but still arguably engaged in work for the employer. Read More
Regardless of the merits of a party's complaint, it will never be heard unless the courts find that it was timely filed. Failure to comply with the statute of limitations isn't just a small "technicality." It is a deal breaker when it comes to negligence litigation. A recent underinsured motorist claim case in Kentucky highlighted the importance of hitting deadlines. It can also be a mistake to file suit on the eve of the running of the statute of limitations. As the plaintiff in the case set out below discovered, waiting until shortly before the expiration of the limitations period can be very costly. Read More
By Kyle Roby, attorney English, Lucas, Priest and Owsley, LLP Even car accident cases that seem simple in the beginning can grow complicated very quickly. In a recent Kentucky fatal car accident case, who was driving the car at the time of the accident was the legal question. The alleged operator of a car involved in a fatal collision accused his passenger of being behind the wheel, even after the operator had pled guilty to manslaughter in criminal court. It was up to the trial court - and the court of appeals, on review - to decide whether the issue was to be resolved by judicial admission or by the jury at trial. Read More